This web page was created to provide supplemental information for the paper
Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-
dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.
Arthur M. Glenberg & David A. Robertson
(2000)
Journal of Memory and LanguageAbstract
Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer & Dumais, 1997) and Hyperspace Analogue to Language ( Burgess & Lund, 1997) model meaning as the relations among abstract symbols that are arbitrarily related to what they signify. These symbols are ungrounded in that they are not tied to perceptual experience or action. Because the symbols are ungrounded, they cannot, in principle, capture the meaning of novel situations. In contrast, participants in three experiments found it trivially easy to discriminate between descriptions of sensible novel situations (e.g., using a newspaper to protect ones face from the wind) and nonsense novel situations (e.g, using a matchbook to protect ones face from the wind). These results support the Indexical Hypothesis that the meaning of a sentence is constructed by a) indexing words and phrases to real objects or perceptual, analog symbols; b) deriving affordances from the objects and symbols; c) meshing the affordances under the guidance of syntax.
Paper describing additional experiments replicating and extending the results
Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 1
Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 2
Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 3
Related Links:
Glenberg (1997). What Memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Barsalou (1998). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
LSA web page http://lsa.colorado.edu
David Robertson's homepage
Art Glenberg's homepage
Mike Kaschak's homepage
Glenberg Research Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison