This web page was created to provide supplemental information for the paper

Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-

dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.

Arthur M. Glenberg & David A. Robertson

(2000) Journal of Memory and Language

Abstract

Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer & Dumais, 1997) and Hyperspace Analogue to Language ( Burgess & Lund, 1997) model meaning as the relations among abstract symbols that are arbitrarily related to what they signify. These symbols are ungrounded in that they are not tied to perceptual experience or action. Because the symbols are ungrounded, they cannot, in principle, capture the meaning of novel situations. In contrast, participants in three experiments found it trivially easy to discriminate between descriptions of sensible novel situations (e.g., using a newspaper to protect one’s face from the wind) and nonsense novel situations (e.g, using a matchbook to protect one’s face from the wind). These results support the Indexical Hypothesis that the meaning of a sentence is constructed by a) indexing words and phrases to real objects or perceptual, analog symbols; b) deriving affordances from the objects and symbols; c) meshing the affordances under the guidance of syntax.

 

Paper describing additional experiments replicating and extending the results

Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 1

Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 2

Materials with LSA computations and behavioral results from Experiment 3

 

Related Links:

Glenberg (1997). What Memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Barsalou (1998). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences

LSA web page http://lsa.colorado.edu

David Robertson's homepage

Art Glenberg's homepage

Mike Kaschak's homepage

Glenberg Research Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison